We Have Filed Our Demand For Disclosure of the Matt Miller Petition to the NYSED Commissioner, Dr John B. King, Jr.
We have filed a demand for disclosure of all documents, including Miller’s correspondence to the NYSED Commissioner relating to Miller’s vindictive and retaliatory, but meritless, demand that the NYSED Commissioner intervene to remove duly elected and sitting RCS board of education member, Rodney Krzykowski.
We’ll publish all of the documents after we receive them from the NYSED Commissioner’s office.
If you’d like to read our demand for disclosure under the provisions of the NY Freedom of Information Law (F.O.I.L.), just click this link: FOIL 2 NYSED re MIller Petition to Remove RK
We expect that Matt “the Mutt” Miller is attempting to invoke the provisions of a section of Education Law relating to appeals to the Commissioner (pursuant to Education Law §§ 310 and 306). But Miller has No Grounds for Such an Appeal to the Commissioner. Matt’s just ignorant.
Education Law §310 provides that persons considering themselves aggrieved by an action taken at a school district meeting or by school authorities may appeal to the Commissioner of Education for a review of such action. In addition, Education Law §306 allows the Commissioner of Education to remove a trustee, member of a board of education and certain other school officers for wilful misconduct or neglect of duty. Obviously, §§ 306 and 310 do not apply to Miller since no board member fits the description according to the law.
Show us whatcha got, Matt!
Sorry, Matt, you’re screwed. We’d suggest you start looking for a job because you’re on borrowed time in the RCS CSD!
And Nothing Less!!!
The Editor
| Special Notice: We make every effort to be truthful, complete, fair, and balanced on this blog; therefore, if you see anything that you know to be false or incorrect, or if you have additional information to clarify any issue, please let us know by e-mailing your information or by leaving a comment. It’s very important to us that we don’t fall into the same category as those whom this blog is intended to expose. Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation and assistance! |
Simon
December 18, 2012 at 7:57 am
Again, you’re making many assumptions as to the content of the letter. You may very well be correct in your guesses, but I will withhold judgement until I see the contents of the petition to the commissioner.
S
LikeLike
RCS Confidential
December 18, 2012 at 9:15 am
While they may be “assumptions” they are made on the authority of the very persons publishing the information upon which we rely. Moreover, should our assumptions be incorrect, the publishers and the primary players have more than generous opportunity to make any corrections they feel should be made, as indicated uniformly at the end of every article, where we post a request for corrections. In the absence of corrections, and knowing that the primary players visit and read the blog regularly, our assumptions as to the facts are quite compatible to what happens in any American courtroom and with which most people are in aggrement: a conclusion may be based upon a particular set of facts, combined with established laws, logic or reasoning, and presumed to be true.
Should the Miller petition submitted to the NYSED Commissioner contain facts that do not support our conclusions, please be assured we will not only make the corrections but publish the actual petition for those interested in deciding for themselves.
Once again, we do agree with reservations with your comment.
Thanks again!
The Editor
LikeLike